United States v. Williamson

279 F. App'x 235
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Williamson. Read the opinion of the Court — 213 F. App'x 235
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 29, 2008·No. Nos. 08-6113, 08-6291·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated cases, Arthur Edward Williamson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion and his motion requesting court records furnished without costs for appellate review. We dismiss the appeal of his Rule 60(b) motion for lack of jurisdiction because his notice of appeal was not timely filed. With respect to Williamson’s appeal of his motion requesting court records, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williamson, Nos. 3:06-cv-02363-HMH; CR-76-19 (D.S.C. Aug. 8, 2007; Feb. 5, 2008). Williamson’s motion for certificate of appealability is denied as unnecessary. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williamson, 279 F. App'x 235 (4th Cir. 2008).

279 F. App'x 235 (United States v. Williamson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.