United States v. Williams

554 F. App'x 244
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 18, 2014·No. No. 13-4615·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Phillip James Williams appeals the district court’s judgment in a criminal case pursuant to the Fair Sentencing Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See United States v. Williams, 4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 16, 2013); see also 18 U.S.C. [245] § 3582(c) (2012); United States v. Black, 737 F.3d 280, 286-87 (4th Cir.2013); United States v. Fraley, 988 F.2d 4, 6-7 (4th Cir.1993); Fed.R.Crim.P. 35. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williams, 554 F. App'x 244 (4th Cir. 2014).

554 F. App'x 244 (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Michael W. Fraley
988 F.2d 4 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Darnell Black
737 F.3d 280 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)