United States v. Williams

364 F. App'x 3
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 227 F. App'x 307
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 3, 2010·No. No. 09-6227·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ike Rayeford Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his “Motion to Re-enter Previous Order of 24 June 2005.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, Nos. 1:98-cr-00101-NCT-3; 1:02-cv-00359 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williams, 364 F. App'x 3 (4th Cir. 2010).

364 F. App'x 3 (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.