United States v. Williams

363 F. App'x 988
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 227 F. App'x 307
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 28, 2010·No. 09-7836·Unpublished

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Barry Earl Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify the eighteen-month sentence the district court imposed upon finding Williams had violated the terms of his supervised release. We have reviewed the record and the issues raised on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Williams, No. 3:00-cr-00177-RLW-1 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 17; entered Sept. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williams, 363 F. App'x 988 (4th Cir. 2010).

363 F. App'x 988 (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.