United States v. Williams

102 F. App'x 359
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 18 F. App'x 52
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 14, 2004·No. 04-6159·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lloyd Anthonie Williams seeks to appeal from the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment for lack of jurisdiction. We remand to the district court for factual determinations regarding whether Williams’ motions for default and summary judgment can constitute a timely notice of appeal, Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988), and whether his motion to file an appeal out of time meets the requirements to reopen the appeals period. Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

REMANDED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williams, 102 F. App'x 359 (4th Cir. 2004).

102 F. App'x 359 (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Houston v. Lack
487 U.S. 266 (Supreme Court, 1988)