United States v. Williams

47 F. App'x 682
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 F. App'x 284
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 10, 2002·No. 02-6951·Unpublished

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Haywood Williams, Jr., alleges that he filed a timely notice of appeal from the denial of his motion for release of his sealed medical records and his motion for reconsideration. However, the district court docket sheet reflects only the filing of a later letter from Williams inquiring about his appeal. Because, under Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988), a notice of appeal is considered filed as of the date Williams delivered it to prison officials for mailing to the court, the district court docket sheet is not conclusive on this issue. Thus, we remand the case for the district court to determine whether Williams filed a timely notice of appeal. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williams, 47 F. App'x 682 (4th Cir. 2002).

47 F. App'x 682 (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Houston v. Lack
487 U.S. 266 (Supreme Court, 1988)