United States v. Williams

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 21, 1997·No. 96-6878·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED: January 15, 1997

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6878

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HAYWOOD WILLIAMS, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

On Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc.

Haywood Williams, Jr. petitions this court for rehearing

of his earlier appeal. We grant the petition for rehearing, deny

the suggestion for rehearing in banc, and vacate and remand the district court's decision. The district court is directed to

determine whether Williams' motion to reinstate a motion under 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Act of Apr. 24, 1996, 28 U.S.C. §

2254 (Law. Co-op. Advance Sheet June 1996), was filed prior to the

enactment of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act

under Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988). Entered at the direction of Judge Luttig. Judge Ervin and

Judge Michael concur in granting the petition for rehearing. Judge

Luttig dissents and would deny the petition for rehearing.

FOR THE COURT,

/s/ Patricia S. Connor CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williams, (4th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Williams (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Houston v. Lack
487 U.S. 266 (Supreme Court, 1988)