United States v. Williams

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Williams

678 F. App'x 814

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 30, 2017·No. No. 16-11080 Non-Argument Calendar·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles Trúncale, appointed counsel for Michael Leon Williams, moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Williams’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Charles Trúncale, appointed counsel for Michael Leon Williams, moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Williams’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Williams, 678 F. App'x 814 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

678 F. App'x 814 (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related