United States v. Williams

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Williams

602 F. App'x 511

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 8, 2015·No. No. 14-13679·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael B. Cohen, counsel for Cedrick Williams in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Williams and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit', counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Williams’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Michael B. Cohen, counsel for Cedrick Williams in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Williams and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit', counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Williams’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Williams, 602 F. App'x 511 (11th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

602 F. App'x 511 (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related