United States v. Williams

CourtUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
DecidedJanuary 10, 2022
DocketS32692
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Williams (United States v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Williams, (afcca 2022).

Opinion

U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS ________________________

No. ACM S32692 ________________________

UNITED STATES Appellee v. Charles R. WILLIAMS Staff Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Air Force, Appellant ________________________

Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 10 January 2022 ________________________

Military Judge: Mark W. Milam. Sentence: Sentence adjudged on 28 January 2021 by SpCM convened at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. Sentence entered by military judge on 17 February 2021: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 10 months, reduction to E-1, and a reprimand. For Appellant: None. * Before JOHNSON, KEY, and MEGINLEY, Appellate Military Judges. ________________________

This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 30.4. ________________________

PER CURIAM: The findings and sentence as entered are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles

* On 28 January 2021 and again on 22 March 2021, Appellant declined, in writing,

appellate defense counsel representation. See United States v. Xu, 70 M.J. 140 (C.A.A.F. 2011) (mem.); see also Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Jus- tice, ¶ 14.5.2 (18 Jan. 2019). United States v. Williams, No. ACM S32692

59(a) and 66(d), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(d) (Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2019 ed.)). Accordingly, the ap- proved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Xu
70 M.J. 140 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-williams-afcca-2022.