United States v. William Thomas Marcum

Fourth Circuit

United States v. William Thomas Marcum

393 F.2d 107

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 4, 1968

Docket12012_1

StatusPublished

This text of 393 F.2d 107 (United States v. William Thomas Marcum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. William Thomas Marcum, 393 F.2d 107 (4th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

*108 PER CURÍAM:

William Thomas Marcum was convicted by a jury of making and fermenting mash in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5601 (a) (7) and possession of nontaxpaid whiskey in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5604 (a) (1). He assigns error to the trial court’s refusal to direct a judgment of acquittal at the conclusion of all the evidence. We find that the evidence was sufficient for the Court to submit to the jury the issue of the defendant’s guilt or innocence. His conviction is Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*108 PER CURÍAM:

William Thomas Marcum was convicted by a jury of making and fermenting mash in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5601 (a) (7) and possession of nontaxpaid whiskey in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5604 (a) (1). He assigns error to the trial court’s refusal to direct a judgment of acquittal at the conclusion of all the evidence. We find that the evidence was sufficient for the Court to submit to the jury the issue of the defendant’s guilt or innocence. His conviction is Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

393 F.2d 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-william-thomas-marcum-ca4-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack