United States v. William Stewart Malone, Jr., A/K/A William Stuart Malone, A/K/A William Stewart Malone

72 F.3d 128, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39590, 1995 WL 752989
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 20, 1995
Docket95-6271
StatusPublished

This text of 72 F.3d 128 (United States v. William Stewart Malone, Jr., A/K/A William Stuart Malone, A/K/A William Stewart Malone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. William Stewart Malone, Jr., A/K/A William Stuart Malone, A/K/A William Stewart Malone, 72 F.3d 128, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39590, 1995 WL 752989 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

72 F.3d 128
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
William Stewart MALONE, Jr., a/k/a William Stuart Malone,
a/k/a William Stewart Malone, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-6271.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 21, 1995.
Decided Dec. 20, 1995.

William Stewart Malone, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Wayne Dworschak, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Malone, Nos. CR-93-312-A; CA-94-1146-AM (E.D.Va. Jan. 25, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 F.3d 128, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39590, 1995 WL 752989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-william-stewart-malone-jr-aka-will-ca4-1995.