United States v. William Randolph, Jr., AKA Clarence Randolph, AKA Bobby Moore

Ninth Circuit

United States v. William Randolph, Jr., AKA Clarence Randolph, AKA Bobby Moore

456 F.2d 689

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 26, 1972

Docket71-2873

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 456 F.2d 689 (United States v. William Randolph, Jr., AKA Clarence Randolph, AKA Bobby Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. William Randolph, Jr., AKA Clarence Randolph, AKA Bobby Moore, 456 F.2d 689 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this passing counterfeit currency case is affirmed.

We reject the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. There are many scraps of evidence, each of which alone means little, put together they could mean a lot to a jury.

On the facts here, disbelief of Randolph’s testimony could lead to some affirmative inferences of knowledge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this passing counterfeit currency case is affirmed.

We reject the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. There are many scraps of evidence, each of which alone means little, put together they could mean a lot to a jury.

On the facts here, disbelief of Randolph’s testimony could lead to some affirmative inferences of knowledge.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

456 F.2d 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-william-randolph-jr-aka-clarence-randolph-aka-bobby-ca9-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack