United States v. William Randolph, Jr., AKA Clarence Randolph, AKA Bobby Moore
456 F.2d 689
Opinion
The judgment of conviction in this passing counterfeit currency case is affirmed.
We reject the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. There are many scraps of evidence, each of which alone means little, put together they could mean a lot to a jury.
On the facts here, disbelief of Randolph’s testimony could lead to some affirmative inferences of knowledge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. William Randolph, Jr., AKA Clarence Randolph, AKA Bobby Moore, 456 F.2d 689 (9th Cir. 1972).
456 F.2d 689 (United States v. William Randolph, Jr., AKA Clarence Randolph, AKA Bobby Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Bradley Sisson Barham, Also Known as Bradley Anderson
466 F.2d 1138 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)