United States v. William Pinkus

466 F.2d 1405
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 16, 1972·No. 72-1069·Published

Opinion

466 F.2d 1405

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William PINKUS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 72-1069.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 16, 1972.

Robert C. Bonner, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Eric A. Nobles, Asst. U.S. Atty., William D. Keller, U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Bernard A. Berkman (argued), Larry S. Gordon, Niki Z. Schwartz, of Berkman, Gordon, Kancelbaum & Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, Jeremiah Casselman, Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendant- appellee.

Before MERRILL and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM:

Under the compulsion of United States v. Weller, 466 F.2d 886, (CA9. 1972), we hold that we have no jurisdiction and that the appeal must be dismissed.

It is so ordered.

*

The Honorable Fred M. Taylor, Senior District Judge for the District of Idaho, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. William Pinkus, 466 F.2d 1405 (9th Cir. 1972).

466 F.2d 1405 (United States v. William Pinkus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. David Galvin Becker
466 F.2d 886 (Seventh Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Pinkus
466 F.2d 1405 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)