United States v. William Pinkus
This text of 466 F.2d 1405 (United States v. William Pinkus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William PINKUS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 72-1069.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 16, 1972.
Robert C. Bonner, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Eric A. Nobles, Asst. U.S. Atty., William D. Keller, U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.
Bernard A. Berkman (argued), Larry S. Gordon, Niki Z. Schwartz, of Berkman, Gordon, Kancelbaum & Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, Jeremiah Casselman, Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendant- appellee.
Before MERRILL and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM:
Under the compulsion of United States v. Weller, 466 F.2d 886, (CA9. 1972), we hold that we have no jurisdiction and that the appeal must be dismissed.
It is so ordered.
The Honorable Fred M. Taylor, Senior District Judge for the District of Idaho, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
466 F.2d 1405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-william-pinkus-ca9-1972.