United States v. William Michael Austrew
317 F.2d 926, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5034
Opinion
Notwithstanding the earnest and skillful efforts of the appellant’s court-appointed counsel, we find no error in the decision of the District Court and affirm upon its opinion 202 F.Supp. 816 (D.Md.1962).
Aifirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. William Michael Austrew, 317 F.2d 926, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5034 (4th Cir. 1963).
317 F.2d 926 (United States v. William Michael Austrew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Scott v. State
405 A.2d 320 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1979)
United States of America, and v. Joe Glennis Wheeler, And
444 F.2d 385 (Tenth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Bryant
291 F. Supp. 542 (D. Maine, 1968)