United States v. William Long
This text of United States v. William Long (United States v. William Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 23-2498 ___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
William Long
Defendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville ____________
Submitted: February 12, 2024 Filed: March 8, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________
Before SMITH, Chief Judge, BENTON and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
The district court 1 sentenced William Long to 120 months in prison after he pleaded guilty to distributing methamphetamine. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C). He argues that his sentence is substantively unreasonable.
1 The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. We conclude otherwise. See United States v. Harris, 960 F.3d 1103, 1106 (8th Cir. 2020) (reviewing for an abuse of discretion). The record establishes that the district court sufficiently considered the statutory sentencing factors, 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and did not rely on an improper factor or commit a clear error in judgment. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461–62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc). It discussed several mitigating factors, including Long’s family history, mental-health issues, and acceptance of responsibility, and varied downward from the recommended range. Just because Long hoped they would be given more weight does not mean the court abused its discretion. See United States v. Moua, 895 F.3d 556, 560 (8th Cir. 2018) (per curiam); see also United States v. McKanry, 628 F.3d 1010, 1022 (8th Cir. 2011) (explaining that it is “nearly inconceivable” that a district court abused its discretion by refusing to vary downward even further (citation omitted)). We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. William Long, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-william-long-ca8-2024.