United States v. William Leslie New

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 15, 2020·No. 20-10553·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 20-10553 Date Filed: 06/15/2020 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________

No. 20-10553 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00116-TFM-B

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM LESLIE NEW,

Defendant-Appellant. ________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama ________________________

(June 15, 2020)

Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Case: 20-10553 Date Filed: 06/15/2020 Page: 2 of 2

Patricia Kemp, appointed counsel for William New in this revocation of

supervised release, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and New’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. William Leslie New, (11th Cir. 2020).

United States v. William Leslie New (United States v. William Leslie New) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)