United States v. William Leslie New
Opinion
Case: 20-10553 Date Filed: 06/15/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________
No. 20-10553 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00116-TFM-B
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM LESLIE NEW,
Defendant-Appellant. ________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama ________________________
(June 15, 2020)
Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Case: 20-10553 Date Filed: 06/15/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Patricia Kemp, appointed counsel for William New in this revocation of
supervised release, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and New’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. William Leslie New (United States v. William Leslie New) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.