United States v. William Kirkaldie

670 F. App'x 452
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 1, 2016
Docket14-30109
StatusUnpublished

This text of 670 F. App'x 452 (United States v. William Kirkaldie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. William Kirkaldie, 670 F. App'x 452 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The government appeals from the district court’s order granting William Tayler Kirkaldie’s motion to dismiss his indictment for domestic abuse by a habitual offender under 18 U.S.C. § 117(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

The district court dismissed the indictment on the ground that the government could not use Kirkaldie’s uncounseled tribal court convictions to prove an element of the offense. After the district court’s decision, the Supreme Court decided that the use of uncounseled tribal court convictions is permissible in a prosecution under section 117. See United States v. Bryant, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 1954, 1966, 195 L.Ed.2d 317 (2016). We agree with the parties that remand is required under Bryant. Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s order dismissing Kirkaldie’s indictment and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Bryant
579 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 F. App'x 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-william-kirkaldie-ca9-2016.