United States v. William Joseph Kirk

Fifth Circuit

United States v. William Joseph Kirk

78 F.3d 160, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4082, 1996 WL 101747

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 5, 1996·No. 94-50472·Published·Cited by 21 cases

Opinion

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 7, 1995, 5 Cir., 1995, 70 F.3d 791)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 7, 1995, 5 Cir., 1995, 70 F.3d 791)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

United States v. William Joseph Kirk, 78 F.3d 160, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4082, 1996 WL 101747 (5th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

78 F.3d 160 (United States v. William Joseph Kirk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related