United States v. William George Dunbar, M. D.

600 F.2d 1192
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. William George Dunbar, M. D.. Read the opinion of the Court — 611 F.2d 985
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 1, 1979·No. 78-1602·Published

Opinion

600 F.2d 1192

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
William George DUNBAR, M. D., Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 78-1602, 78-5050.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 1, 1979.

Randall M. Clark, Brunswick, Ga., for defendant-appellant.

Wm. T. Moore, Jr., U. S. Atty., Katherine L. Henry, William H. McAbee, II, Asst. U. S. Attys., Savannah, Ga., Wade Livingston, William C. Bryson, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellee.

(Opinion March 26, 1979, 5 Cir., 591 F.2d 1190)

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court's own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. William George Dunbar, M. D., 600 F.2d 1192 (5th Cir. 1979).

600 F.2d 1192 (United States v. William George Dunbar, M. D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. William George Dunbar, M.D.
591 F.2d 1190 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
United States v. Dunbar
600 F.2d 1192 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)