United States v. William G. Howard
This text of 421 F.2d 1359 (United States v. William G. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
421 F.2d 1359
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
William G. HOWARD, Appellant.
No. 23559.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 6, 1970.
Frederick L. Hetter, II (argued), San Diego, Cal., for appellant.
Joseph A. Milchen, Asst. U.S. Atty., Edwin L. Miller, U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and BRYNE,1 District judge.
PER CURIAM:
The court finds as to defendant-appellant William G. Howard insufficient evidence to sustain the conviction.
As to him, the judgment is reversed.
The Honorable William M. Byrne, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
421 F.2d 1359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-william-g-howard-ca9-1970.