United States v. William Earl Marshall

428 F.2d 464, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8615
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 18, 1970
Docket14267
StatusPublished

This text of 428 F.2d 464 (United States v. William Earl Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. William Earl Marshall, 428 F.2d 464, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8615 (4th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Defendant William E. Marshall appeals his conviction of possession of a contraband sawed-off shotgun. 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841, 5861(d) and 5871.

The shotgun was discovered in the glove compartment of a 1963 Pontiac registered in the name of and owned by defendant’s brother, Edward Marshall. This motor vehicle had been used by the defendant with the consent of his brother for some two or three weeks prior to the arrest. At the trial the owner of the vehicle, Edward Marshall, testified unequivocally that he consented to the search of the glove compartment and gave permission for a locksmith to open it in the presence of police officers. Although there was other testimony from which it might reasonably be argued that truly voluntary consent was lacking, we think the inference drawn by the district judge was not clearly erroneous. Even on cross-examination Edward stated that his consent was not given through fear and that he had not complained of the search.

The other points, of error do not merit discussion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Registration of firearms
26 U.S.C. § 5841

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
428 F.2d 464, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-william-earl-marshall-ca4-1970.