United States v. William Earl Marshall
This text of 428 F.2d 464 (United States v. William Earl Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant William E. Marshall appeals his conviction of possession of a contraband sawed-off shotgun. 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841, 5861(d) and 5871.
The shotgun was discovered in the glove compartment of a 1963 Pontiac registered in the name of and owned by defendant’s brother, Edward Marshall. This motor vehicle had been used by the defendant with the consent of his brother for some two or three weeks prior to the arrest. At the trial the owner of the vehicle, Edward Marshall, testified unequivocally that he consented to the search of the glove compartment and gave permission for a locksmith to open it in the presence of police officers. Although there was other testimony from which it might reasonably be argued that truly voluntary consent was lacking, we think the inference drawn by the district judge was not clearly erroneous. Even on cross-examination Edward stated that his consent was not given through fear and that he had not complained of the search.
The other points, of error do not merit discussion.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
428 F.2d 464, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-william-earl-marshall-ca4-1970.