United States v. William D. Pedersen
This text of 342 F.2d 46 (United States v. William D. Pedersen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
342 F.2d 46
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
William D. PEDERSEN, Appellee.
No. 19405.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
March 5, 1965.
Rehearing Denied April 9, 1965.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Harry C. Westover, Judge.
John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Morton Hollander, Max Wild, Attorneys, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Francis C. Whelan, U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Robert W. Fraser, Santa Ana, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, BARNES and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Reversed and remanded for a new trial which will permit each side to offer the evidence it believes should be considered by the trial court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
342 F.2d 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-william-d-pedersen-ca9-1965.