United States v. William Cooley

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 17, 1998
Docket98-1386
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. William Cooley (United States v. William Cooley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. William Cooley, (8th Cir. 1998).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________

No. 98-1386EM _____________

United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * William L. Cooley, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _____________

Submitted: July 17, 1998 Filed: July 17, 1998 _____________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. _____________

PER CURIAM.

William L. Cooley pleaded guilty to possessing "cocaine base (crack)" with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Using the Guidelines for crack cocaine, the district court sentenced Cooley to concurrent prison terms of 78 months plus four years supervised release. Cooley appeals his sentence, and we affirm.

Cooley contends the disparate sentencing scheme for crack as opposed to powder cocaine violated his Fifth Amendment right to equal protection and due process. Cooley also contends that our earlier decisions on this issue are no longer applicable in light of the United States Sentencing Commission's April 1997 report and the proposal of Attorney General Reno and Drug Czar McCaffrey (forwarded to Congress by President Clinton), both of which recommend modifying the sentencing scheme. Congress has not changed the law, however, and Cooley's challenge is foreclosed by our decisions upholding the constitutionality of the 100-to-1 ratio, see, e.g., United States v. Carter, 91 F.3d 1196, 1197-99 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam); United States v. Jackson, 67 F.3d 1359, 1367 (8th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1192 (1996).

We thus affirm Cooley's sentence.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. William Cooley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-william-cooley-ca8-1998.