United States v. William Cleveland Merritt, Jr.
454 F.2d 1162, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11405
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 8, 1972·No. 71-2727·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The defendant contends that his confession was not voluntarily given and, further, that he was deprived of the benefit of counsel during the interrogation. The district judge, after a hearing on motion to suppress, found that his confession was voluntarily given, and that he had voluntarily waived his right of counsel. These findings are not clearly erroneous. United States v. Gunn, 428 F. 2d 1057 (5th Cir. 1970). The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. William Cleveland Merritt, Jr., 454 F.2d 1162, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11405 (5th Cir. 1972).
454 F.2d 1162 (United States v. William Cleveland Merritt, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Fred Louis Bell and Charles Lavern Beasley
457 F.2d 1231 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)