United States v. William Clapp, A/K/A William Clark
This text of 386 F.2d 438 (United States v. William Clapp, A/K/A William Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
-OPINION OF THE COURT
Following a jury trial, the defendant Clapp was found guilty on seven counts of a nine-count indictment charging violations of Section 1010, Title 18 U.S. C.A. in the making of false statements in applications for property improvement loans to the Federal Housing Administration, via the Brookline Savings and Trust Company, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
The District Court denied the defendant’s alternative motion for judgment of acquittal and/or a new trial and entered the judgment of sentence which resulted in the instant appeal.
On review of the record we do not subscribe to the defendant’s contention that the evidence adduced at the trial was insufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict of guilty, nor do we subscribe to his further contention that the trial judge erred in the admission of evidence.
The District Court’s Judgment of Sentence will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
386 F.2d 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-william-clapp-aka-william-clark-ca3-1967.