United States v. William Charles McNeill

Ninth Circuit

United States v. William Charles McNeill

442 F.2d 1342, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9721

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 9, 1971

Docket26016

StatusPublished

This text of 442 F.2d 1342 (United States v. William Charles McNeill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. William Charles McNeill, 442 F.2d 1342, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9721 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

442 F.2d 1342

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
William Charles McNEILL, Appellant.

No. 26016.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 9, 1971.

Michael Balaban (argued), Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant.

John M. Newman, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., (appeared) Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., Eric A. Nobles, Asst. U.S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief, Crim.Div., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before HAMLEY, DUNIWAY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed. Ehlert v. United States, 402 U.S. 99, 91 S.Ct. 1319, 28 L.Ed.2d 625 (1971).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI