United States v. William C. Runyon

Eighth Circuit

United States v. William C. Runyon

621 F.2d 317, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 17231

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMay 27, 1980

Docket79-2072

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 621 F.2d 317 (United States v. William C. Runyon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. William C. Runyon, 621 F.2d 317, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 17231 (8th Cir. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Runyon was convicted on three counts of possessing unregistered firearms in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5861(d) and 5871. The sole contention raised on appeal is whether the trial court committed plain error in failing to give an unrequested insanity instruction to the jury. In our judgment, the court did not plainly err. The charge of possession of unregistered firearms requires only that the defendant be shown to have possessed an item that he knew to be a firearm. Morgan v. United States, 564 F.2d 803, 805 (8th Cir. 1977). Runyon introduced testimony by a psychiatrist in an attempt to show he did not have that knowledge, and the trial judge instructed the jury on that issue. In light of Runyon’s failure to pursue an insanity defense at trial or to request an instruction thereon, plain error was not shown by the court’s failure to instruct the jury on that defense. See United States v. DiBenedetto, 542 F.2d 490, 494 (8th Cir. 1976).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Runyon was convicted on three counts of possessing unregistered firearms in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5861(d) and 5871. The sole contention raised on appeal is whether the trial court committed plain error in failing to give an unrequested insanity instruction to the jury. In our judgment, the court did not plainly err. The charge of possession of unregistered firearms requires only that the defendant be shown to have possessed an item that he knew to be a firearm. Morgan v. United States, 564 F.2d 803, 805 (8th Cir. 1977). Runyon introduced testimony by a psychiatrist in an attempt to show he did not have that knowledge, and the trial judge instructed the jury on that issue. In light of Runyon’s failure to pursue an insanity defense at trial or to request an instruction thereon, plain error was not shown by the court’s failure to instruct the jury on that defense. See United States v. DiBenedetto, 542 F.2d 490, 494 (8th Cir. 1976).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

621 F.2d 317, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 17231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-william-c-runyon-ca8-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack