United States v. William Bradley Kargoe

Fourth Circuit

United States v. William Bradley Kargoe

391 F.2d 284

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 8, 1968

Docket11877

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 391 F.2d 284 (United States v. William Bradley Kargoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. William Bradley Kargoe, 391 F.2d 284 (4th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The factual determination of the district judge made at the trial when he admitted defendant’s statements in evidence against him that the statements were freely and voluntarily made in full knowledge of defendant’s rights under Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964), was not clearly erroneous. We affirm the conviction and judgment entered thereon.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The factual determination of the district judge made at the trial when he admitted defendant’s statements in evidence against him that the statements were freely and voluntarily made in full knowledge of defendant’s rights under Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964), was not clearly erroneous. We affirm the conviction and judgment entered thereon.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

391 F.2d 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-william-bradley-kargoe-ca4-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack