United States v. William B. Hall, A/K/A Bill

Fourth Circuit

United States v. William B. Hall, A/K/A Bill

48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11080, 1995 WL 95841

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 9, 1995

Docket94-7052

StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1217 (United States v. William B. Hall, A/K/A Bill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. William B. Hall, A/K/A Bill, 48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11080, 1995 WL 95841 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

48 F.3d 1217
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
William B. HALL, a/k/a Bill, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-7052.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 9, 1995.

William B. Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hall, No. CR-87-100-N (E.D. Va. July 15, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

48 F.3d 1217
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
William B. HALL, a/k/a Bill, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-7052.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 9, 1995.

William B. Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hall, No. CR-87-100-N (E.D. Va. July 15, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11080, 1995 WL 95841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-william-b-hall-aka-bill-ca4-1995.