United States v. Wilkerson

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Wilkerson

22 F. App'x 301

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 21, 2001·No. 01-6816·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rahnaun Andre Wilkerson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b), based upon substantial assistance, and his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint appen *302 dix, and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wilkerson, No. CR-99-385 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 5, 2001 & entered Apr. 6, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rahnaun Andre Wilkerson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b), based upon substantial assistance, and his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint appen *302 dix, and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wilkerson, No. CR-99-385 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 5, 2001 & entered Apr. 6, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Wilkerson, 22 F. App'x 301 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

22 F. App'x 301 (United States v. Wilkerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related