United States v. Wilder

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

United States v. Wilder

74 M.J. 322, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 288

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided March 19, 2015·No. No. 15-0087/MC·Published

Opinion

CCA 201400118. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue specified by the Court:

WHETHER THE PROMULGATION OF RCM 707 ABROGATED THE “SUBSTANTIAL INFORMATION” RULE ORIGINATED IN UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON, 23 C.M.A. 91, 48 C.M.R. 599 (1974).

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 201400118. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue specified by the Court:

WHETHER THE PROMULGATION OF RCM 707 ABROGATED THE “SUBSTANTIAL INFORMATION” RULE ORIGINATED IN UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON, 23 C.M.A. 91, 48 C.M.R. 599 (1974).

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

United States v. Wilder, 74 M.J. 322, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 288 (Ark. 2015).

Pincite

74 M.J. 322 (United States v. Wilder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related