United States v. Wicks

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Wicks

14 F. App'x 294

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 1, 2001·No. No. 00-7728·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Bryant Wicks, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal, relying on United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir.2001), and United States v. Pregent, 190 F.3d 279, 284 n. 5 (4th Cir.1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

David Bryant Wicks, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal, relying on United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir.2001), and United States v. Pregent, 190 F.3d 279, 284 n. 5 (4th Cir.1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

United States v. Wicks, 14 F. App'x 294 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

14 F. App'x 294 (United States v. Wicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related