United States v. Wicks

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 8/9/96 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 95-6332 v. (D.C. No. CR-91-176-A) (W.D. Okla.) JAMES THEODORE WICKS, also known as James Theron Watts, also known as James Wicks, also known as James T. Wicks, also known as James Paul Egdahl, also known as Jimmy Ray Bertrano, also known as James Theron Wicks, also known as James Theodore Watts, also known as Theodore Theron Wicks, also known as Theodore T. Wicks,

Defendant-Appellant.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before PORFILIO, BRIGHT, ** and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. ** Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

We affirm substantially for the reasons provided by the district court.

The judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of

Oklahoma is AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge

-2-