United States v. Whitmore

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Whitmore

702 F. App'x 936

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 13, 2017·No. No. 17-11753 Non-Argument Calendar·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Leigh Ann Webster, appointed counsel for Destín Whitmore in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Whit-more’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Leigh Ann Webster, appointed counsel for Destín Whitmore in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Whit-more’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Whitmore, 702 F. App'x 936 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

702 F. App'x 936 (United States v. Whitmore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related