United States v. White

19 C.M.A. 456, 19 USCMA 456, 42 C.M.R. 58, 1970 CMA LEXIS 871, 1970 WL 6979
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. White. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 C.M.A. 211
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided May 22, 1970·No. No. 22,858·Published

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

Failure of the law officer to orally advise the court-martial on sentence voting procedures requires a setting aside of the sentence in this case. United States v Pryor, 19 USCMA 279, 41 CMR 279 (1970); United States v Sandoval, 19 USCMA 281, 41 CMR 281 (1970); United States v Heaston, 19 USCMA 281, 41 CMR 281 (1970); United States v Matlock, 19 USCMA 282, 41 CMR 282 (1970); and United States v Mora, 19 USCMA 284, 41 CMR 284 (1970).

The decision of the Court of Military Review is therefore set aside as to sentence and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. A rehearing on the sentence may be ordered.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge FERGUSON concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. White, 19 C.M.A. 456, 19 USCMA 456, 42 C.M.R. 58, 1970 CMA LEXIS 871, 1970 WL 6979 (cma 1970).

19 C.M.A. 456 (United States v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Pryor
19 C.M.A. 279 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Sandoval
19 C.M.A. 281 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Heaston
19 C.M.A. 281 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Matlock
19 C.M.A. 282 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Mora
19 C.M.A. 284 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)