United States v. White

28 F. Cas. 570, 5 D.C. 368, 5 Cranch 368
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided November 15, 1837·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Court

(Thruston, J.,

absent,) directed the marshal to take the defendant into custody during this discussion;

But, upon consideration, were of opinion that the recognizance being to attend from day to day to answer to the charge, and not to depart without the leave of the Court, was not discharged by the quashing of the indictment; and, as he had been heretofore long in confinement upon this.charge, and having had three juries sworn, without a valid verdict; and having now appeared upon his recognizance,

The Court refused to require new bail, but permitted him to go upon the old recognizance; and upon affidavit continued the cause until the next term, the grand jury having found a new indictment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. White, 28 F. Cas. 570, 5 D.C. 368, 5 Cranch 368 (circtddc 1837).

28 F. Cas. 570 (United States v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The United States v. Vowell and M'clean
9 U.S. 368 (Supreme Court, 1809)