United States v. White

Fifth Circuit

United States v. White

95 F. App'x 654

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 20, 2004·No. 03-10371·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Jimmy Earl White, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). White has not filed a response.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein. The appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Jimmy Earl White, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). White has not filed a response.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein. The appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. White, 95 F. App'x 654 (5th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

95 F. App'x 654 (United States v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related