United States v. White

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. White. Read the opinion of the Court — 258 F.3d 374
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2002·No. 01-30537·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30537 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO WHITE,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-30023-ALL -------------------- February 21, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Antonio L. White pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy

to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine

base. White appeals his sentence arguing that the district court

erred in finding him responsible for 56.7 grams of cocaine base.

The district court’s determination of the quantity of drugs for

sentencing purposes is a factual finding that we review for clear

error. United States v. Torres, 114 F.3d 520, 527 (5th Cir.

1997). The testimony of the probation officer is the only

evidence in the record regarding the drug transactions in

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-30537 -2-

question. The testimony supports the district court’s finding

regarding the amount of cocaine base that is relevant conduct to

White’s offense of conviction. Accordingly, White cannot show

that the district court was clearly erroneous in its factual

finding.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. White, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. White (United States v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related