United States v. White

57 F. App'x 202
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. White. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 F. App'x 295
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 14, 2003·No. 02-7923·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Willie Tyron White appeals the district court’s order denying his “Petition for Court Review of a Plea Promise to File a 5K1.1 Motion.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. White, No. CR-01-27 (W.D.Va. Dec. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *203 and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. White, 57 F. App'x 202 (4th Cir. 2003).

57 F. App'x 202 (United States v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.