United States v. White

Fourth Circuit

United States v. White

57 F. App'x 202

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 14, 2003

Docket02-7923

StatusUnpublished

This text of 57 F. App'x 202 (United States v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. White, 57 F. App'x 202 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Willie Tyron White appeals the district court’s order denying his “Petition for Court Review of a Plea Promise to File a 5K1.1 Motion.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. White, No. CR-01-27 (W.D.Va. Dec. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *203 and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Willie Tyron White appeals the district court’s order denying his “Petition for Court Review of a Plea Promise to File a 5K1.1 Motion.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. White, No. CR-01-27 (W.D.Va. Dec. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *203 and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 F. App'x 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-white-ca4-2003.