United States v. Wheeler

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 24, 1997·No. 96-7044·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7044

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FRAZER ARTHUR WHEELER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-92, CA-96-557)

Submitted: December 17, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1997

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frazer Arthur Wheeler, Appellant Pro Se. S. David Schiller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Anti- terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Wheeler, Nos. CR-92-92; CA-96-557 (E.D. Va. June 24, 1996). Appellant's motion to strike the Govern-

ment's informal brief is denied. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-

sional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wheeler, (4th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Wheeler (United States v. Wheeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related