United States v. Westfall

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 23, 2009·No. 08-30853·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED December 23, 2009 No. 08-30853 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RANDALL WESTFALL

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:06-CR-20131-ALL

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Randall Westfall has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Westfall has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. No. 08-30853

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Westfall, (5th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Westfall (United States v. Westfall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)