United States v. Westfall
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED December 23, 2009 No. 08-30853 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
RANDALL WESTFALL
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:06-CR-20131-ALL
Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Randall Westfall has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Westfall has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. No. 08-30853
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Westfall (United States v. Westfall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.