United States v. West

Fourth Circuit

United States v. West

55 F. App'x 209

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. West. Read the opinion of the Court — 98 F. App'x 259 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 5, 2003·No. 02-7479·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Preston West appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of an order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. West, No. CR-97-175 (D.Md. July 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *210 and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Preston West appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of an order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. West, No. CR-97-175 (D.Md. July 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *210 and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. West, 55 F. App'x 209 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

55 F. App'x 209 (United States v. West) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related