United States v. Wesley

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Wesley

667 F. App'x 794

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 2, 2016

DocketNo. 16-6371

StatusPublished

This text of 667 F. App'x 794 (United States v. Wesley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Wesley, 667 F. App'x 794 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Lee Wesley appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to [795]*795reduce his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wesley, No. 1:97-cr-00382-HCM-2, 2016 WL 3579010 (E.D. Va. Feb. 24, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Lee Wesley appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to [795]*795reduce his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wesley, No. 1:97-cr-00382-HCM-2, 2016 WL 3579010 (E.D. Va. Feb. 24, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

667 F. App'x 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-wesley-ca4-2016.