United States v. Wendell O'Neal

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
• Decided: August 2, 2024
• Docket: 24-11535
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 24-11535 Document: 33-1 Date Filed: 08/02/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-11535 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WENDELL DWAYNE O'NEAL,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 5:24-cr-00110-LCB-HNJ-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-11535 Document: 33-1 Date Filed: 08/02/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-11535

Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Wendell O’Neal, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s April 29, 2024 order directing the government to respond to several of his motions. The order is not a final and appealable judgment because O’Neal has not been convicted or sentenced in this case. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Flanagan v. United States, 465 U.S. 259, 263 (1984). It is not immediately appealable under the collat- eral order doctrine because it did not decide or resolve anything— it simply directed the government to respond to O’Neal’s motions. See United States v. Shalhoub, 855 F.3d 1255, 1260 (11th Cir. 2017). Further, because the order did not resolve any of O’Neal’s motions, he was not injured by it, and therefore, he does not have standing to appeal the order. See United States v. Pavlenko, 921 F.3d 1286, 1289 (11th Cir. 2019). All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.