United States v. Wendell Jeter

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided March 23, 1998·No. 97-3589·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 97-3589 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Missouri. * Wendell Jeter, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * *

___________

Submitted: February 3, 1998 Filed: March 23, 1998 ___________

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Wendell Jeter pleaded guilty to fraudulently concealing two promissory notes in his Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152. The district court1 imposed a 12-month-and-1-day term of imprisonment and a two-year supervised release term. Jeter challenges his sentence, arguing that the district court erred in its

1 The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. determination of loss based on the value of the notes. Jeter contends that the notes were valueless because the maker was insolvent.

Under the sentencing guidelines the amount of the loss should be measured by fair market value. U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1. Although the district court focused on the face value of the notes in determining loss, we conclude after a review of the record as a whole that any error was harmless because there was evidence to support the loss level used in sentencing and, if the next lower loss level had been used, it would have resulted in the same base offense level. See U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1.

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wendell Jeter, (8th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Wendell Jeter (United States v. Wendell Jeter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related