United States v. Wences-Adame

343 F. App'x 952
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 2, 2009
Docket08-31105
StatusUnpublished

This text of 343 F. App'x 952 (United States v. Wences-Adame) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Wences-Adame, 343 F. App'x 952 (5th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Jesus Wenees-Adame (“Wences”) appeals his conviction following a bench trial for assaulting a federal officer, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111. He argues that § 111 does not apply to his conduct in assaulting an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) employed by the West Baton Rouge Parish Detention Center, which had contracted with the United States Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Service, as predecessor to Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Office of Detention and Removal Operations, and Border Patrol, to hold federal detainees pending their removal. Wences’s argument is unavailing in light of United States v. Jacquez-Beltran, 326 F.3d 661, 663 (5th Cir.2003).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. determined that this opinion should not be R. 47.5.4. published and is not precedent except under

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Jacquez-Beltran
326 F.3d 661 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
343 F. App'x 952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-wences-adame-ca5-2009.