United States v. Wemmering

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Wemmering. Read the opinion of the Court — 232 F. App'x 372
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 4, 2010·No. 09-6464·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6464

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CRYSTAL DAWN WEMMERING,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:04-cr-00347-F-3)

Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 4, 2010

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deborrah Lynn Newton, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Crystal Dawn Wemmering appeals the district court’s

order denying her motions for recusal and for a new trial. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Wemmering, No. 5:04-cr-00347-F-3

(E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wemmering, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Wemmering (United States v. Wemmering) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.