United States v. Wemmering
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6464
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CRYSTAL DAWN WEMMERING,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:04-cr-00347-F-3)
Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 4, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Deborrah Lynn Newton, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Crystal Dawn Wemmering appeals the district court’s
order denying her motions for recusal and for a new trial. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Wemmering, No. 5:04-cr-00347-F-3
(E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Wemmering (United States v. Wemmering) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.