United States v. Welch

8 C.M.A. 315, 8 USCMA 315, 24 C.M.R. 125, 1957 CMA LEXIS 375, 1957 WL 4721
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided October 18, 1957·No. No. 10,479·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

At the trial, defense counsel objected to the admission of a pretrial statement by the accused on the ground that it was obtained in violation of Article 31, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 831. The accused testified in support of the objection. The president of the court overruled the objection and admitted the statement but he did not at any time instruct the court members on their right to consider the question of voluntariness in their deliberations on the accused’s guilt or innocence. Under the circumstances, the omission constitutes prejudicial error. United States v Yearty, 8 USCMA 191, 23 CMR 415.

The decision of the board of review is reversed. The findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside. A rehearing may be ordered.

Judge Ferguson concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Welch, 8 C.M.A. 315, 8 USCMA 315, 24 C.M.R. 125, 1957 CMA LEXIS 375, 1957 WL 4721 (cma 1957).

8 C.M.A. 315 (United States v. Welch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Minnifield
9 C.M.A. 373 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)