United States v. Welch

8 C.M.A. 315, 8 USCMA 315, 24 C.M.R. 125, 1957 CMA LEXIS 375, 1957 WL 4721
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedOctober 18, 1957
DocketNo. 10,479
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 C.M.A. 315 (United States v. Welch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Welch, 8 C.M.A. 315, 8 USCMA 315, 24 C.M.R. 125, 1957 CMA LEXIS 375, 1957 WL 4721 (cma 1957).

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

At the trial, defense counsel objected to the admission of a pretrial statement by the accused on the ground that it was obtained in violation of Article 31, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 831. The accused testified in support of the objection. The president of the court overruled the objection and admitted the statement but he did not at any time instruct the court members on their right to consider the question of voluntariness in their deliberations on the accused’s guilt or innocence. Under the circumstances, the omission constitutes prejudicial error. United States v Yearty, 8 USCMA 191, 23 CMR 415.

The decision of the board of review is reversed. The findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside. A rehearing may be ordered.

Judge Ferguson concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Minnifield
9 C.M.A. 373 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 C.M.A. 315, 8 USCMA 315, 24 C.M.R. 125, 1957 CMA LEXIS 375, 1957 WL 4721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-welch-cma-1957.